TMtelegram: Different products, similar trademarks


October 8, 2026

Weekly newsletter • No action required.

Hello Reader,

Plastic bags and paper labels are easy to tell apart. Could similar names for those products still create a trademark conflict?

In a recent case, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board said yes.

A business sought to register MAXXOUT for general-purpose plastic bags and merchandise bags. The USPTO refused the application because of an existing MAXOUT! registration for multilayer pressure-sensitive paper labels. The Board affirmed the refusal.

The extra “X” and the exclamation point did little to separate names that sounded the same. The evidence also showed specialized suppliers offering bags and labels to business customers. The product descriptions did not contain the restrictions on customers or sales channels that the applicant’s arguments assumed.

The useful question is whether buyers might think the products come from the same business.

A customer does not need to mistake a bag for a label. Similar branding can suggest that two distinct products belong to one company or to connected companies.

When I think about a proposed brand name, I therefore look beyond businesses selling the exact same item:

  • What related products do the same suppliers commonly sell?
  • Would the same buyers encounter both brands?
  • What impression does the name make when spoken, rather than just compared letter by letter?

This decision is specific to its evidence. It does not mean every bag brand conflicts with every label brand. It is a reminder that a search limited to identical names and identical products can miss an important part of the picture.

My practical takeaway for a new product launch: include the neighboring products and businesses that customers would naturally associate with it when planning the trademark search.

Read the MAXXOUT ruling

Best,

J.J. Lee and the Trademark Lawyer Law Firm Team


Trademarks Registered This Week

Here are the trademarks our firm helped register this week:

J.J. Lee, Trademark Attorney

Learn something new every Monday! Join over 4,000 entrepreneurs and business owners for weekly Trademark tips, tricks, and news.

Read more from J.J. Lee, Trademark Attorney
A person in a color-blocked rugby shirt and green trousers on a rusted metal roof

October 22, 2026 Weekly newsletter • No action required. Hello Reader, Adding a few words can make a brand name look different on paper. Customers may still recognize the same core name. A recent PET-AGREE decision illustrates that point, with an important wrinkle: the applicant had already lost an earlier trademark proceeding. Mars, the owner of PEDIGREE registrations, had successfully opposed PET AGREE for pet-grooming supply store services. The applicant later tried PET-AGREE GROOMING...

Logos of popular web browsers displayed on a screen

October 15, 2026 Weekly newsletter • No action required. Hello Reader, Imagine a business hires a designer for a new logo. The invoice is paid, the files arrive, and the business begins using the design. A year later, it wants another agency to adapt the artwork for packaging. What rights did the original agreement provide? Payment, file delivery, and copyright ownership are separate questions. Copyright in qualifying creative work generally starts with its author. A business may have...

Two women reviewing documents together at a wooden table in a workspace

October 1, 2026 Weekly newsletter • No action required. Hello Reader, Someone on a team comes up with a great brand name. Another person develops the logo. The business pays for the website and starts using the brand. Who owns the trademark? A recent decision involving the BIRTH JUSTICE logo shows why the answer takes more than identifying the person who had the idea. An attorney conceived the brand and registered its domain before joining a law firm. The completed logo was then developed and...